When Does Software Cross the Line and Become a Medical Device?

The FDA is currently facing a crucial decision regarding a widely used prescription drug monitoring software package. Efforts are underway to persuade the FDA to remove this software from the market, sparking a broader debate on how much technology influences opioid prescribing practices.

Patients who require long-term opioid therapy or are experiencing acute pain are being turned away by healthcare providers, according to Beverly Schechtman, Vice President of the Doctor Patient Forum, a nonprofit organization focused on pain patients. Schechtman expressed her concern, stating that the situation is progressively worsening.

Become a Subscriber

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading this article.

Subscribe Now

According to The Center for U.S. Policy, the software in question, Bamboo Health's NarxCare, should be classified as a medical device and subject to regulation because of the way it assists doctors and other providers in determining whether a patient should receive painkillers.

The FDA's response to this issue holds significant implications, as it could establish a critical precedent at a time when the agency faces mounting pressure to address the overdose crisis and keep pace with the increasing role of technology in healthcare.

The central question before the FDA is whether the software qualifies as a medical device and falls under their specific oversight. Alternatively, the FDA may consider the argument that NarxCare should fall under state jurisdiction, given its role in enabling state-run Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs).

NarxCare is a platform that provides a set of software-based tools for medical professionals that facilitate their access to and understanding of PDMP information.

This deliberation raises significant considerations for the FDA and the wider healthcare community. The classification of software as a medical device holds implications for regulation, quality control, and patient safety. As technology continues to permeate the healthcare landscape, understanding how software functions within the framework of medical devices is essential.

Uncertainty surrounds the extent to which providers rely on NarxCare's scores, but the FDA expressed concerns about automation bias in its guidance without specifically mentioning Bamboo's software. The FDA stated that providers may have a tendency to "over-rely on a suggestion from an automated system."

Striking the right balance is crucial to ensuring patient access to appropriate pain management while mitigating the potential for abuse or misuse. Given the urgency of the overdose crisis and the rapid advancements in healthcare technology, the FDA's decision will play a pivotal role in shaping future regulations and guidelines.

It will influence how the agency manages the intersection of technology and healthcare, addressing concerns regarding patient privacy, data security, and the effectiveness of prescription drug monitoring.

Ultimately, the FDA's deliberation on whether software like NarxCare should be classified as a medical device will have far-reaching implications. It will determine the regulatory landscape surrounding such technologies and their use in combating the opioid crisis.